<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Honest-Metrics on F. Latini - IT Engineer</title><link>https://latini.dev/tags/honest-metrics/</link><description>Recent content in Honest-Metrics on F. Latini - IT Engineer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://latini.dev/tags/honest-metrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Comparison That Refuses to Compare</title><link>https://latini.dev/posts/the-comparison-that-refuses-to-compare/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://latini.dev/posts/the-comparison-that-refuses-to-compare/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt; - I added a &amp;ldquo;compare two athletes&amp;rdquo; feature to a side project. The chart was an afternoon. The honesty took the rest of the week. A rank only means something relative to who else was in the field - 1st out of 8 is not 1st out of 30 - so a naive overlay of two athletes&amp;rsquo; placings is a confident lie. The feature I shipped refuses to declare a winner unless the two actually competed in the same event &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; the same category, and when they never met it says so, in a box, on purpose. This is the same discipline I keep writing about for platforms: a number out of context is &lt;a href="https://latini.dev/posts/dora-metrics-without-the-dashboard-theatre/"&gt;dashboard theatre&lt;/a&gt;, and the honest move is to surface your own uncertainty instead of hiding it behind a clean line.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>